
Platz für neues - hier die Ablage für 2010
Dienstag 29. Juni, 19.30 Uhr, EineWeltHaus
von Münchner Friedensbündnis und
Münchner Bündnis gegen Krieg und Rassimus
Diskussionspunkte für die Debatte über die "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" und die Positionierung der Protestbewegung:
Mit kurzen Einführungsstatements von Thomas Rödl und Claus Schreer
von Walter Listl, 6. April 2009
Ein erster Kommentar zu einem Text in Indymedia (siehe Link/ "Indymedia linksunten") den ich nach Rückkehr aus Strasbourg las.
Ein Nebensatz bei der Berichterstattung über das brennende Ibishotel in Strasbourg ließ aufhorchen: Das Hotel sei zum Zeitpunkt des Brandes unbewohnt gewesen.
Welch seltsame Zufälle es doch gibt.
(Deutsche Übersetzung kommt morgen)
I am grateful for the opportunity to come from the United States to participate in this rally for peace, and thank you for allowing me to speak.
My country has been hijacked by a criminal cabal intent on using the hard-earned dollars of the American people for war, occupation, and empire.
As a result, the national leadership of my country, both Democratic and Republican, became complicit in war crimes, torture, crimes against humanity, and crimes against the peace.
Ich werde im folgenden einige Anmerkungen zum Thema „Krise & Krieg“ machen.
Dabei will ich nicht die platte These: „In der Krise zunehmende innere Spannungen werden nach außen getragen“ vertreten.
Schließlich beteiligt sich die Bundeswehr bereits seit 2001 am Krieg in Afghanistan – also seit einem Zeitpunkt, der etliche Jahre vor dem Beginn der aktuellen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise liegt. Auch sind heftige innere Konflikte aufgrund der Krise in der BRD bislang ausgeblieben.
Trotzdem bestehen Zusammenhänge zwischen Krise u. Krieg:
Liebe Genossinnen und Genossen, Kolleginnen und Kollegen,
heute findet seit 7 Jahren zum ersten Mal wieder ein städtischer Empfang für die Teilnehmer der NATO- Sicherheitskonferenz statt. Ich frage mich, wie der Oberbürgermeister bei einem Empfang, der zuletzt vor sieben Jahren stattfand von einer Tradition sprechen kann? Herr Ude, das ist nicht unsere Tradition, sondern Ihre persönliche Tradition!
Was wollen OB Ude und andere mit diesem Empfang erreichen oder zeigen?
Die sog. Sicherheitskonferenz, die an diesem Wochenende im Bayerischen Hof stattfindet, hat offensichtlich ein Image-Problem.
Ihr neuer Chef, Wolfgang Ischinger, beteuert, dies sei keine Kriegskonferenz und wer ihn für einen Kriegstrommler hält, müsse zum Arzt gehen.
Wir freuen uns, dass sich so viele Kriegsgegner dafür entschieden haben zur Demonstration statt zum Arzt zu gehen, das hätte die Krankenkassen auch überfordert.
Wir lassen uns von dem Gerede von einer angeblich neuen, „friedlichen“ Sicherheitskonferenz nicht täuschen.
Trotz Kälte und Dauernieselregen haben sich rund 3.000 Menschen am Samstag an der Demonstration anlässlich der sog. Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz beteiligt.
Die zentrale Forderung unserer Demonstration war der sofortige Abzug der NATO- und Bundeswehrtruppen aus Afghanistan und damit die Beendigung des Krieges, der bereits Zehntausende Tote und Verletzte unter der afghanischen Bevölkerung gekostet hat.
The members of governments of NATO countries, high-ranking officers, military strategists, and arms lobbyists who meet in Munich every year at the so-called Security Conference have one thing in common: they share the responsibility for the illegal wars waged against Yugoslavia, Iraq, and Afghanistan, with many thousands of deaths, for growing terror, torture, and sufferings of refugees.
NATO, and with it Germany, have declared the whole world their area of operation. At the same time, the militarization of the EU is being pushed intensively. The EU is arming so as to be able to wage wars on its own. The new EU treaty specifies that the member states undertake to upgrade their military capabilities, and that a European agency for promoting armament will be created.
In violation of our Constitution, and against the will of the majority of the people, the Bundeswehr is taking part in the war in Afghanistan. That war is about geostrategic interests that are supposed to be implemented militarily with the help of NATO: access to markets and raw materials, the hegemony of the rich and powerful NATO states, and their military presence in the region. For the population of Afghanistan, this means terroristic air raids, expulsion, destruction, torture, and death by the thousands.
Now that it is becoming more and more obvious, even to the politicians responsible, that they cannot achieve their goals by military means alone, NATO is trying to change its strategy; and this is also reflected in the Munich Security Conference.
The concept of civilian-military cooperation (CMC) and the instrumentalization of nongovernmental organizations are intended to allow the old NATO goals to be pursued more effectively. The inclusion of commercial firms and energy specialists, as well as topics such as disarmament, resource security, piracy, terrorism, and "human security" in future 'Security Conferences' are part of this.
According to the head of the Security Conference, there is a debate about whether "we should continue to use basically NATO to implement national-security interests, or rather the EU, or both structures with their respective military capabilities". The people of Afghanistan are currently experiencing the results of these "military capabilities".
This is why the 2010 'Security Conference' is another war conference, which we will oppose with our varied and creative protest.
It is not an immediate withdrawal of all the foreign troops that would make Afghanistan collapse in chaos; on the contrary, it is NATO's terrorist war and the continuing occupation which are causing the lethal chaos in that country.
An immediate withdrawal of the Bundeswehr and all the other foreign troops and mercenaries will not solve Afghanistan's problems; but this withdrawal is an essential precondition for self-determined and peaceful development and the reconstruction of the country.
The NATO warmaking alliance and the impending military great power EU are a threat to all mankind. The warmaking alliance NATO should be abolished. - Therefore, we also demand: Get out of NATO - Get out of all EU military structures - Abolish the Bundeswehr!
The billions spent on armaments and war must be redirected to social needs!
At present, more than two-thirds of the worldwide military expenditures of about 1.4 trillion dollars a year are spent by the NATO countries. At the same time, world poverty continues to increase. The number of people going hungry grew to more than a billion last year. The policies of the rich and powerful nations - the USA and the EU countries in particular - are also largely responsible for the plundering of natural resources, the increasing destruction of the environment, and the climate catastrophe. These policies serve the profit interests of the big banks and corporations, and the arms manufacturers, above all.
While billions are being spent here in Germany on new weapon systems and the global military interventions of the Bundeswehr, the Federal government is demolishing our social-welfare systems. The burden on the unemployed and the employed, young people, pensioners, and welfare recipients is growing constantly. The rich get richer, while the poor get poorer.
War, hunger, torture, environmental destruction, and no hope for the future are the causes of the misery of millions of refugees. So we oppose the sealing off of the borders of 'Fortress Europe', Frontex military missions against refugees, any kind of exclusion of immigrants, discriminatory laws for foreigners, the virtual abolition of the right of asylum, deportations, and every form of racism. - Combat the causes of their flight, not the refugees! - No camps - No barbed wire - No deportation!
With our demonstration against the so-called 'Security Conference', we are also standing up for the unrestricted right to the freedoms of assembly, opinion, and demonstration.
Under the pretext of a growing danger of terrorism, fundamental democratic rights and our Constitution are being undermined systematically. The unconstitutional mixing of the responsibilities of the police and state security bodies (Verfassungsschutz), online searches of private computers, the required storage of data on everybody's telecommunications, biometric registration of all citizens, preventive detention, and the restrictions on the right to demonstrate mark the way to an authoritarian state with constant surveillance of the people. The Bundeswehr is already being used to support the police at home, in violation of the Constitution.
Kommentare
25 hafta 2 gün önce
32 hafta 2 gün önce
32 hafta 2 gün önce
32 hafta 6 gün önce